Farres, L. G. (2000). A mental training tool: Assessment as a learning tool. BC Coach’s Perspective, 5 (1), 13-16.
A Mental Training Tool:
By Laura G. Farres, Ph.D., Ch. P.C.
Once the area of mental skills is identified by athletes as an aspect they wish to improve, coaches are then left with the task of deciding how to assess athletes' current usage and level of ability in this area in order to design an effective program. When we think of assessing nutrition or physiology in athletes, a number of tests or exercises spring to mind that athletes can engage in, in order to help them determine their subsequent course of action. However, when it comes to assessing mental skills in athletes, the choices are less clear. As this initial stage is a vital component of the overall mental skills training program, coaches need to be exposed to assessment procedures that are appropriate for them to use and that can benefit the athletes involved.
The key to the assessment process is to view it, not as a separate step, but rather as a comprehensive part of the program. Coaches can begin to help athletes develop their understanding and direction in the area of mental training at this preliminary stage. This goal can be achieved by selecting assessment tools that promote active learning and engage the athletes in the assessment process. The goal of this paper is to explore two such assessment tools, the Mental Training Exercises (MTE) 1 and 2 as developed by Terry Orlick and John Partington (Orlick & Partington, 2000; Partington & Orlick, 2000) and to examine how coaches can use these tools to help their athletes understand and develop their mental skills.
Before exploring the MTEs, it is important to determine exactly what is meant by the word assessment as it relates to mental skills training. Poczwardowski, Sherman and Henschen (1998) defined assessment as "identifying the athlete, coach, or organization's needs, wants, strengths and weaknesses with respect to psychological aspects that are critical to individual or collective growth within the sport environment" (p. 195). If we take this definition a little further and consider that assessment can also be a valuable learning opportunity for athletes (and coaches), we can define assessment as an ongoing process whereby athletes actively engage in identifying, determining and refining their mental skills through the process of reflection and articulation. This process is further supplemented by ongoing constructive evaluations and feedback. This definition highlights that assessment, in and of itself, is not stagnant, but rather, active. As individuals learn and develop, their needs and skill levels change. Consequently, assessment procedures should also be active with the meanings that the athletes derive from the experience playing a central part in the process.
As a result, coaches who are looking to assess athletes' mental skills should consider assessment tools that engage the athletes in active learning. These types of tools will allow the athletes to direct and reflect upon their own learning through meaningful exercises that engage them in opportunities to share their experiences. Assessment for the athletes then becomes a fun exercise in self-discovery as opposed to a potentially sterile and intimidating process.
Mental Training Exercises (MTE) 1 and 2
Both Orlick and Partington have extensive experience working with top level performers (Orlick & Partington, 1986, 1988; Orlick, 1990). Their idea to develop the MTE 1 (Partington & Orlick, 2000) and 2 (Orlick & Partington, 2000) emerged from requests from athletes who wanted a more comprehensive way of understanding, attaining and/or adjusting their mental skills. Orlick and Partington's challenge was to develop a meaningful assessment process whereby athletes could actively discover their present mental strengths and direct their own areas for improvement. Two exercises arose from this challenge -- the MTE-1 which focuses primarily on mental aspects related to practice and the MTE-2, which focuses on the mental aspects related to competition. All items in the MTE 1 and 2 reflect elements that top level performers indicate contribute to their ability to achieve high level goals.
For coaches, the main advantage of these tools is that the athletes play an active rather than passive role in the assessment process. Athletes are required to reflect on their past performances in practice and competition, identify their usage of various strategies and determine their mental goals for the future. In addition, they are able to refer back to the tools as a way of monitoring their improvement in the various areas. The tools are uncomplicated and easy to understand and apply. Both tools are presented here, their components described and sample questions from each section provided.
MTE 1 - Mental Training Exercise for Quality Practice
The MTE-1 (Partington & Orlick, 2000) consists of 39 items which explore athletes' perception of their behaviours in four mental training areas related to practice: commitment, goal-setting, imagery and attentional focusing. The questions reflect top athletes' ideas about the mental components necessary for quality practice.
Commitment is an essential component of top level performances. When athletes decide the level of commitment that they will make to their sport, they are better able to guide their future choices and accept the necessary sacrifices in their lives. Orlick (2000) indicates that excellence is possible when athletes demonstrate high levels of dedication, self-discipline, passion and love for what they do. Athletes who have made a commitment to their sport will constantly strive to improve and adjust their performance even in the face of less favourable performance outcomes. Athletes who have a sound understanding of their commitment level are more able to adjust their training, priorities and expectations. In exploring their commitment to their sport, athletes respond to questions in the MTE-1 such as:
Goal setting can contribute to athletes' direction, focus and belief. By setting specific target areas to improve, athletes can acknowledge their past and current achievements and envision and chart out their future. Goals also contribute to athletes' ability to identify and focus on the appropriate areas determined to enhance their performance. Concomitantly, it allows them to see themselves progressing even in situations where their motivation may be challenged such as practice. By knowing what areas to focus on, athletes are also better at identifying and overcoming potential distractors in training. Finally, as athletes witness themselves achieving their goals, their confidence and belief develops. Ultimately, this allows them to set and achieve more difficult goals. In examining their goal setting ability, athletes respond to questions in the MTE-1 such as:
Imagery is useful for guiding athletes' belief, focus and performance. Through imagery athletes can pre-experience and re-experience feelings, sensations, actions and/or skills that are part of their desired performance. Top level performers experience clear, positive, process-oriented images as real feelings in their body and mind. These images serve to guide athletes' actions, reactions and experiences. Athletes can reflect on their imagery ability by responding to questions in the MTE-1 such as:
Focus is arguably the most important mental skill. It is the central component of many athletes' best performances or zone experiences and the key component in the concept of 'FLOW', the process of total absorption in an activity (Jackson & Csikszentmihalyi, 1999). The ability to be able to completely focus on the task at hand, attend and respond appropriately to all relevant cues, and be undisturbed by distractions and elements both within and outside athletes' control, can contribute significantly to desired performance outcomes. During practice new skills are learned, old skills practiced and adjusted as necessary, strategies and decision making skills challenged and relevant cues identified. Being able to focus well during practice will enhance athletes' learning and retention and cement key performance components required for competition. Athletes can explore their ability to focus in practice by reflecting and responding to questions in the MTE-1 such as:
MTE-2 - Mental Training Exercise for Quality Performance
Orlick and Partington (2000) divided competition into 3 phases - precompetition, competition and post competition. Each of these phases is believed to demand particular mental skills in order to optimally focus, deal with distractions and maximize performance outcomes. The areas on the MTE- 2 reflect these phases. It consists of 35 questions which explore athletes' perception of their behaviours in five mental training areas related to quality performance: pre-competition focus, precompetition distraction control, competition focus, competition distraction control and post-competition learning. The items characterize what top level athletes have said about the mental criteria for quality performance.
Precompetition focus refers to the ability to consistently create, adjust and carry the most effective mental state into a performance situation. Often the most effective mental state is a product of both physical and mental strategies that athletes employ to prepare themselves for competition (Orlick, 1986). Top level performers often follow a specific plan prior to competition that allows them to consistently create the necessary thoughts and feelings associated with their optimal performances. Athletes are asked to reflect on their precompetition focus by responding to questions in the MTE-2 such as:
Pre Competition - Distraction Control
Precompetition focus is only effective if it is able to be maintained and regained quickly in the face of distractions. Prior to competition there are a number of factors both internally and externally based that can distract athletes from their ideal focus. Being able to control these distractions in an effective manner and regain the appropriate focus is a vital skill that many top performers possess (Orlick, 2000). When reflecting on their precompetition distraction control ability, athletes are asked to respond to questions in the MTE-2 such as:
Competition focus is the ability to stay connected to the task at hand, focusing on the relevant cues and responding quickly and appropriately within the environment. Each sport has different psychological demands during the competition depending on the specific physical, technical and logistical demands of the sport (Taylor, 1996). Based on these demands, often sports can be broken down into critical parts or examination points with specific focus reminders to engage in when these stages occur (Orlick, 1986). Competition plans can be useful tools to maintaining and regaining appropriate focus in these situations. Conversely, general cues can be used throughout the performance whenever required to maintain the best focus. Athletes are asked to reflect on their ability to focus during competition by responding to questions in the MTE-2 such as:
Competition Distraction Control
The inability to deal with distractions appropriately during a competition is arguably one of the leading causes of undesired performance outcomes. Top performers often develop a refocusing plan for competition where they anticipate and identify possible distractors and plan their responses to these elements if and when they arise (Orlick, 2000). Part of this ability is being able to see advantages to every situation even in less than ideal circumstances. In reflecting on their ability to control distractions during competition, athletes are asked to respond to questions in the MTE-2 such as:
Post Competition Learning
Mental skills do not end once the competition is over. Learning is ongoing and the successes and/or failures in one competition can lead to valuable lessons contributing to performance gains in the next competition. Top level performers take the time to extract the learning from each situation and apply it to the next (Orlick, 2000). In essence that is what post competition learning is -- the ability to effectively analyze performance and draw out valuable lessons that will facilitate future development. When reflecting on their ability to learn post competition, athletes are asked to respond to questions in the MTE-2 such as:
Both the MTE-1 and 2 end with a self-evaluation section where athletes can reflect on their responses to the exercises and determine what areas need improvement. This section allows athletes an opportunity to actively construct their knowledge through reflection and articulation thus promoting their awareness. Awareness develops when athletes are challenged to reflect on feedback, identify their strengths and weaknesses and correct and refine their responses. Athletes are asked to reflect on, and respond to, questions in the MTE-2 such as:
How to Use the MTE 1 and 2
When deciding how to use the MTEs, coaches need to consider the athletes involved and the amount of time that will be invested in the assessment process. The MTEs can be used in both a self-directed and guided discovery fashion as well as individually and with groups. At this preliminary stage coaches can ask themselves the following questions to help them determine in which way to best use the assessment tools:
Once coaches have answered these question, they may have a better idea of how to best use the MTEs in their program. The following table demonstrates the 4 different ways of carrying out the assessment process with the MTEs.
Regardless of the approach chosen, athletes should be supported by an environment in which they are encouraged and challenged to develop their mental skills in concert with the physical, technical and tactical strategies (see Farres, 2000 for a detailed discussion). Through an environment that supports active learning, athletes can assess and develop their mental skills optimally.
The goal of this paper has been to explore two assessment tools, Mental Training Exercises 1 and 2, and to examine how coaches can use these tools to help their athletes understand and develop mental skills. The main benefit of these two tools is that the athletes play an active part in the assessment process and that through the assessment, athletes can learn more about mental skills in general and about their individual strengths and areas to improve. The tools are easy to use and understand and can be modified to fit the specific situation. I invite coaches to explore the MTEs as a comprehensive part of their mental training program.
Farres, L.G. (2000). A mental training tool: Implementing an effective mental skills training program. BC Coaching Magazine, September.
Jackson, S.A. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Orlick, T. (1986). Psyched for sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Orlick, T. (1990). Pursuit of excellence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Orlick, T. (2000). Wheel of excellence [On-line]. Available: rems.net/orlick/psyched.htm
Orlick, T. & Partington, J. (1986). Psyched: Inner views of winning [On-line]. Available: rems.net/orlick/psyched.htm
Orlick, T. & Partington, J. (1988). Mental links to excellence. The Sport Psychologist, 1, 4-17.
Orlick, T. & Partington, J. (2000). Modeling mental links to excellence: MTE-2 for quality performance. Journal of Excellence [On-line], 2. Available: www.sportquest.com/excellence
Partington, J. & Orlick, T. (2000). Modeling mental links to excellence: MTE-1 for quality practice. Journal of Excellence [On-line], 1. Available: www.sportquest.com/excellence/
Poczwardowski, A., Sherman, C. P., & Henschen, K. (1998). A sport psychology service delivery heuristic: Building on theory and practice. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 191-207.
Taylor, J. (1995). A conceptual model for integrating athletes' needs and sport demands in the development of competitive mental preparation strategies. The Sport Psychologist, 9, 339-357.
Laura Farres is a certified mental trainer with the Canadian Mental Training Registry and a chartered professional coach. She conducts individual and group sessions and has experience with a variety of sports, ages and performance levels. Currently, she is involved with Team BC as one of two mental trainers helping the provincial teams prepare for the Canada Summer Games 2001 in London, Ontario. Please feel free to contact her email@example.com for more information.
Excerpts from the MTE 1 & 2 are presented here with the permission of Dr. Terry Orlick. For a complete copy of the MTE 1 and 2, please feel free to contact either the author of this article, Laura Farres at firstname.lastname@example.org or Dr. Terry Orlick at email@example.com
Get free PDF reader
Download PDF - 151KB
Become a Member | Home | About Us | Services | Sport | Corporate Coaching | Lifestyle | Publications | Articles | Links | Contact Us
© Copyright 2005 Mind in Motion Consulting Inc., Vancouver B.C., Canada. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.